|
|
Post by Nuggets GM (Stephen) on Jul 2, 2012 19:32:58 GMT -5
Raptors trade:
Joe Johnson: 19.8M, 21.5M, 23.2M, 24.9M
Pau Gasol: 19M, 19.3M
Mario Chalmers: 4M, 4M
pick 19 in the rookie draft
Raptors will cover 10 million of Joe Johnson's salary for the next 4 years
Raptors will cover 8 million of Pau Gasol's salary for the next 2 years
Nuggets trade:
Blake Griffin: 7.2M, 9.4M
Jan Vesely: 3.3 M, 3.5 M, 4.2M, 5.7M
8.25 in the commencement draft
10.25 in the commencement draft
1st rounder in the 2013 rookie draft
pick 2.25 in the 2012 rookie draft
2nd rounder in the 2013 rookie draft
I agree because- again- I think this trade makes me a deeper and better team although it does leave me a bit strapped for cash. I have added Jan Vesely and a 10th rounder in the commencement draft in this deal
|
|
|
|
Post by freak4 on Jul 2, 2012 19:59:06 GMT -5
I've had 9 trade offers. Blake Griffin is easily the best player involved in any one of these trades and Jan Vesely is probably the 3rd or 4th best player. That speaks to the crap that people are trying to dump on me. Honestly, any of these other trades will also get vetoed. I'm sorry that I am giving up so much talent in one trade, but you have no clue how bad these other trade offers are. Easy accept.
|
|
|
|
Post by Suns GM (Mike) on Jul 2, 2012 20:58:11 GMT -5
I understand, Raptors that you were put on a tough position when you joined this league. Its just that even though this is your best trade offer it still is unfair. I think him adding vesely helps, but I don't understand why u are also including chalmers, your first round pick and all that money for all those years that is my issue. Veto (0-1).
|
|
|
|
Post by Warriors GM (Ethan) on Jul 2, 2012 21:09:14 GMT -5
I also sympathize with you Raptors. But I heavily suggest giving it a shot to wait. Even wait a bit into the season.
Now the reason I still cannot approve this (and it's not even close) is because you're paying back 18m for 2-4 years. That's crazy man. Don't pay that much cap because you are cutting yourself in a deep hole that this trade doesn't help much. Other problems exist but that's my biggest one.
Veto (0-2)
|
|
|
|
Post by Rockets GM (Kyle) on Jul 2, 2012 21:17:26 GMT -5
Approve (1-2) looks a little lop due just to the fact that raptors are covering 56 mil over 4 years.......seems a bit large to me
but the players and picks in question seems pretty fair
3 players and a pick
for
2 players and 5 picks
there are 3 superstars involved in this trade but JJ barley cuts it in my book considering the salary.......and as im typing this i see JJ is being traded to the nets......not sure if it hurts or helps JJ value.......as i said earlier....APPROVE
|
|
|
|
Post by Trail Blazers GM (Landon) on Jul 4, 2012 14:56:10 GMT -5
I understand your situation Raptors, but just because other offers are bad doesn't mean you need to give another team a helluva offer. You're better off with the guys you started with.
Veto 1-3
|
|
|
|
Post by wolfer3 on Jul 5, 2012 17:18:54 GMT -5
Hawks really never like to veto unless totally lopsided, the covered dollars by Raptors really straps considering our low CAP here. Sorry but... veto (1-4)
PS, I agree with earlier post that just because it may be the best offer doesn't make it a good offer.
|
|
|
|
Post by Magic GM (Zach) on Jul 9, 2012 9:04:52 GMT -5
Sorry, but Raptors, you are giving up way too much. That's all there is to it.
Veto (1-5)
|
|
