Bucks/Rockets

[irish647f]

Bucks receive:

1rst round 20th pick (commencement)

rockets 8th round (commencement)

rockets 7th rounder

1rst round 2012 rookie draft (10th overall)






Rockets receive:

1rst round 15th pick (commencement)

bucks 8th round (commencement)

bucks 10th round (commencement)

[Heat GM (Brandon)]

Borderline Approve (1-0)

Rockets want to move up 5 spots, which can be the difference of a star like Deron Williams or someone like Kyrie Irving/Bandon Jennings. Rockets is giving a lot, but still not a veto in my eyes.

[76ers GM (Oren&Bryn)]

see now that is what is an unfair trade... moving up 5 spots in round one at this stage doesnt make a uge difference because you can still get a nice young player with both picks. rockets 8th round is also before bucks and rockets 7th round he is moving down 3 rounds... AND incliuding a top 10 pick with a heavy stacked draft through 15 picks... it would be basically fair maybe just change it a bit without the rookie pick!! im sorry i hate vetoing trades unless they are quite unfair and bucks gain way too much compared to what they give up. veto (1-1)

[Lakers GM (Austin)]

There isnt much difference in the talent available at 15 compared to 20, plus you get a stud rookie, plus you move up 3 rounds from 10 to 7. Gotta veto this. (1-2)

[76ers GM (Oren&Bryn)]

count is (1-2)

[Suns GM (Mike)]

Veto for reasons stated above (1-3).

[Spurs GM (Bryan)]

Veto, giving up too much and same reason as stated above (1-4)

[Warriors GM (Ethan)]

Approve (2-4)

Guys, this is ridiculous. You only veto if there is a CLEAR harm. And there isn't! its their choice. if rockets really likes a guy in the 1st, who's to say a 1st rookie isnt worth that? commencement 1sts are very important in developing team. im of the opinion that if you have a guy you want left in the 1st, go get em.

[Trail Blazers GM (Landon)]

This one really made me think really hard. I had to talk it over with Warriors and after talking with him I think I am going to have to approve this. It is a lot to give up to move up five spots, but we're talking about an upgrade in your franchise player and that is worth so much that if the team is willing to give up their top 10 rookie pick I gotta give them the benefit of the doubt. Personally I wouldn't do this, but I don't think it is enough to veto (3-4)

[76ers GM (Oren&Bryn)]

yes ethan i comepletely understand what you are saying but a top 10 rookie pick in this much of a stacked draft and more is too much maybe the first and the rookie is more than enough imo and i think there is clear harm for the future and for now. he loses depth and a great young rookie

[Timberwolves GM (Alex)]

Approve, stop making such close judgments on deals. Will either side NOT benefit in either present or future... no. Will this have a significant impact on the league? No. Approve (4-4). Enough of this vetoing for the smallest unfairness. There will be a bunch of .500 teams if we don't let owners deal.

[Lakers GM (Austin)]

I change my vote to approve so we can just get over it! (5-3) approved. Jesus. haha

[76ers GM (Oren&Bryn)]

this is approved pending rockets acceptance

[Suns GM (Mike)]

You can't change your vote. That is pointless. That is basically letting the group influence your decision

[Lakers GM (Austin)]

Nvm im not allowed to so someone just approve this for me. (4-4)