|
Post by 76ers GM (Oren&Bryn) on Apr 29, 2012 18:35:25 GMT -5
The 76ers agree to send their fifth, eighth , and tenth round picks in return for the timberwolves fifth, ninth, eleventh round picks and their first round draft pick in the commencement draft.
Trade Breakdown:
76ers recieve: Timberwolves 5th (#131) 9th (#251) and 11th(#301) round picks and their first round (#19) amatuer draft pick.
Timberwolves Recieve: 76ers 5th (#129), 8th (#242) and 10th (#292) round picks.
|
|
|
Post by bob on Apr 29, 2012 19:43:36 GMT -5
Approve. Didn't mind the last one so i don't mind this one
|
|
|
Post by Timberwolves GM (Alex) on Apr 29, 2012 20:43:05 GMT -5
I accept, I now have multiple picks in rounds 8 and 10. Should help me with depth.
|
|
|
Post by Magic GM (Zach) on Apr 29, 2012 20:48:08 GMT -5
Eh, I'm on the fence with this one.... I need to see some other opinions.
Also, please post the year of the amatuer pick and the number pick in the round from now on. thanks.
|
|
|
Post by wolfer3 on Apr 29, 2012 20:48:49 GMT -5
i before e except after c lol
|
|
|
Post by wolfer3 on Apr 29, 2012 20:49:26 GMT -5
yeah i too was wondering the info zach asked for
|
|
|
Post by 76ers GM (Oren&Bryn) on Apr 29, 2012 21:03:46 GMT -5
ok i updated it
|
|
|
Post by Magic GM (Zach) on Apr 29, 2012 21:03:49 GMT -5
I think I am going to have to veto. May be just me though. But the you go up 2 spots on your fifth man, then upgrade bench players by like 10 spots, then give up a potential beast (might I state that this rookie draft is STACKED.) Just not enough for me.
(1-1)
|
|
|
Post by 76ers GM (Oren&Bryn) on Apr 29, 2012 21:06:17 GMT -5
a potential beast at 19... highly doubt it... the rookie draft is stacked to about 15 max after that its not very good and 8th and tenth are not bench players... and the key to winning is depth
|
|
|
Post by Magic GM (Zach) on Apr 29, 2012 21:07:29 GMT -5
And depth is built up with 6th and 7th rounders (extra). That's just my opinion. Maybe others don't see that the way I do.
|
|
|
Post by 76ers GM (Oren&Bryn) on Apr 29, 2012 21:08:36 GMT -5
i understand where your coming from but i think two good owners agreeing on a trade is good enough and its not horribly unfair imo but ill let other people vote
|
|
|
Post by Magic GM (Zach) on Apr 29, 2012 21:13:36 GMT -5
It's hard to judge picks though.
|
|
|
Post by Trail Blazers GM (Landon) on Apr 29, 2012 21:15:14 GMT -5
i'd like to hear more from the timberwolve's side about why he is deciding to give up his 1st round pick in the rookie draft for so little.
|
|
|
Post by Timberwolves GM (Alex) on Apr 29, 2012 21:17:44 GMT -5
I'm sitting here, and i honestly can't argue my case...i guess i was trigger happy. Vote as you wish.
|
|
|
Post by Trail Blazers GM (Landon) on Apr 29, 2012 21:22:39 GMT -5
I don't like vetoing trades but I honestly don't see how this helps timberwolves in a big enough way to compensate for a rookie on a very nice contract. Veto (1-2)
|
|